Building off its recent investigation of the mistreatment and disappearance of asylum-seeking children, the Observer recently published an editorial rightfully slams the U.K. government’s absolving “itself of its ethical and legal responsibilities to these children.”
The U.K.’s Children Act 1989 places a legal duty on local authorities for the safeguarding and protection of all children in need in their local area, regardless of who they are or how they arrived in the U.K., the editorial notes. “This applies to unaccompanied children seeking asylum in the UK, the vast majority of whom will also meet the threshold for being taken into the care of their local authority.”
Asylum-seeking children “are in a no man’s land: there is no local authority whose care they fall under and so they are, unlawfully, not protected by the 1989 Children Act,” the editorial went on to say.
“There is no one with corporate parental responsibility for them, no one with the formal legal power to advocate on their behalf. They have been left to the residual care of the Home Office, probably the most dysfunctional department in Whitehall,” the editorial said.
More than 100 charities recently called on Prime Minister Rishi Sunak to stop what they said is the “unlawful” use by the Home Office of hotels from which hundreds of children seeking asylum have gone missing, the Financial Times reported.